All Posts

In every organization I have worked with, there comes a moment when a well-meaning leader holds up a dashboard, points to the green indicators, and says: 'We're doing well.' The numbers are solid. The board is satisfied. The strategic plan is on track. And yet, somewhere in the same institution, a significant portion of the people it serves or employs would describe a very different experience. This is the central tension at the heart of organizational effectiveness: success

American organizations spent nearly $900 billion replacing employees who voluntarily left their jobs in a single year. Nine hundred billion dollars. Not on strategy. Not on innovation. On replacement. That number, from the Work Institute's most recent retention research, is staggering. But what makes it strategically significant is not its size. It is what drives it. Because the research is equally clear on that front: the majority of employee departures are preventable. An

There is a governance conversation that most boards are not having - not because they lack the information, but because the people at the table have never had to see the institution from the outside. Every board has blind spots. That is not a criticism - it is an organizational reality. The question is not whether blind spots exist. The question is whether your governance structure is designed to surface them before they become crises. And in my experience, the answer for t

Every organization I have ever worked with believed it was measuring the right things. Leaders could point to dashboards, annual reports, and strategic plan scorecards as evidence of institutional health. The numbers told a story of progress. And yet, in too many of those same organizations, talented people were quietly leaving. Critical decisions were being made without the perspectives that would have made them sharper. And the institution's stated values were quietly diver

There is a persistent and costly misconception in executive leadership, that the president's primary job is to report to the board. Quarterly updates. Enrollment numbers. Budget variance reports. The assumption is that if the data looks good and the board is satisfied, leadership is working. It isn't. Not fully. The most effective presidents, chancellors, and chief executives understand something that transforms the nature of institutional leadership: the board relationship i

As we continue to navigate an era of perpetual change, higher education leaders must embrace a paradox: we must become more adaptable while remaining anchored to our core mission of advancing knowledge and human potential. The institutions that emerge stronger from current crises will be those that learned to see change not as a threat to their identity, but as an expression of their commitment to serving students and society in whatever form the future demands. The question

Perhaps most critically, leading through crisis in higher education requires acknowledging that every policy change, budget cut, or strategic pivot affects real people pursuing education, conducting research, or dedicating their careers to learning. Effective change management must balance institutional survival with human dignity and educational mission. This means communicating transparently about challenges while maintaining hope, involving stakeholders in solution-finding

The most effective crisis leaders in higher education don't just manage individual emergencies; they build organizational capacity for ongoing adaptation. This means creating systems that can flex without breaking, fostering cultures of experimentation rather than perfection, and developing communication channels that work across the complex stakeholder ecosystem of students, faculty, staff, alumni, and community partners. During the pandemic, institutions that thrived were t

Higher education institutions face a particular challenge when it comes to change management. Unlike corporations that can pivot quickly, universities are anchored by tradition, shared governance structures, and deeply embedded cultural practices. Faculty tenure, institutional pride, and academic freedom create both stability and resistance to transformation. Today's leaders must also navigate an increasingly complex political landscape where external forces directly challeng

Crisis has become the defining characteristic of modern higher education. From the pandemic's sudden shift to remote learning to ongoing challenges with enrollment, funding, and rapidly evolving workforce demands, educational leaders find themselves navigating constant uncertainty. Yet within this turbulence lies an opportunity to fundamentally reimagine how we lead and adapt. For strategic guidance on navigating complex organizational change in higher education, reach out to

Literary Salon in Oaks Bluff, Martha's Vineyard